Abstract

The following analysis is based on a multidimensional understanding of poverty using a nonmonetary basic needs approach. It is ground on data from the first survey on household living conditions for poverty assessment, conducted by the National Institute of Statistics of Congo in 2005. Multiple Correspondence Analysis is applied to construct a composite indicator by aggregating several attributes likely to reflect the poverty of individuals or households. The application shows that Congolese households are not affected by the same type of poverty. Three types of non-monetary poverty are identified: infrastructure poverty, vulnerability of human existence and poverty of comfort. These households were then classified according to the composite indicator of Poverty. The results show that the incidence of poverty corresponds to the weight of poor class of about 70.67%.

Highlights

  • Poverty is a complex phenomenon, a multidimensional state that is cultural, economic, social and political

  • Multiple Correspondence Analysis is applied to construct a composite indicator by aggregating several attributes likely to reflect the poverty of individuals or households

  • The results show that the incidence of poverty corresponds to the weight of poor class of about 70.67%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Poverty is a complex phenomenon, a multidimensional state that is cultural, economic, social and political. According to Alkire [1], “poverty can go hand in hand with poor health, insufficient education, low income, precarious housing, difficult work, food insecurity, loss of political responsibility” Each of these states reflects a particular aspect of individual deprivation and taken together; they illustrate the multidimensionality of this phenomenon. The aim is to make a multidimensional exploration of poverty using multiple correspondence analysis from nonmonetary indicators of well-being. With this method, one possibility is to define a composite indicator of poverty by aggregating several attributes or variables likely to reflect the poverty of individuals or households; it is on the basis of this aggregate that the various poverty measures can be made.

Conceptual Framework
The Welfarist School
The Basic Needs School
The Capability School
Methodological Framework
Axiomatic Methods
Nonaxiomatic Methods
Distance Function Approach
Statistical Methods
Non-Monetary Dimensions of Poverty
Multiple Correspondence Analysis of Nonmonetary Poverty Dimensions
Steps in the Construction of the Composite Indicator of Poverty
Preliminary MCA
Final MCA on CIP Variables
Weights of the CIP
Incidence of Multidimensional Poverty
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.