Abstract
The Hamilton–Perry method, which uses cohort change ratios (CCR) and child-woman ratios (CWR), has gained acceptance as research has demonstrated its practical value and accuracy in forecasting population composition. Assessments of this method have been based on the usual assumption that CCRs and CWRs developed over the base period are held constant over the forecast horizon. We propose several approaches for modifying CCRs and CWRs over the forecast horizon. These alternatives are averaging and trending these ratios and a synthetic method that bases local CCRs and CWRs changes on state-level changes in CCRs and CWRs. We evaluate the errors for these alternatives against the errors holding the CCRs and CWRs constant for counties in Washington State and for census tracts in New Mexico. The evaluation suggests that averaging or trending CCRs and CWRs are not worthwhile strategies, but the synthetic method reduces errors compared to holding the ratios constant over the horizon.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
