Abstract

Metacognition entails a critical understanding regarding the self-evaluation of thinking and learning. The tasks that law students undertake require both cognitive and metacognitive strategies. It is argued that, in the absence of metacognition, people may be unaware of their own incompetence. Without proper understanding of complex intellectual property (IP) Law issues, it can be difficult to attain competence in a way that serves the global nature of IP disputes, effective communication with clients and proper knowledge of subject matter from the perspectives of different jurisdictions. This article evaluates how IP Law teaching might become more effective at integrating metacognition strategies with teaching and learning activities.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.