Abstract

BackgroundMachine learning has been shown to outperform traditional statistical methods for risk prediction model development. We aimed to develop machine learning-based risk prediction models for cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation for ischemic heart disease (IHD) using self-reported questionnaire data. MethodsThe 45 and Up Study was a retrospective population-based study in New South Wales, Australia (2005–2009). Self-reported healthcare survey data on 187,268 participants without a history of cardiovascular disease was linked to hospitalisation and mortality data. We compared different machine learning algorithms, including traditional classification methods (support vector machine (SVM), neural network, random forest and logistic regression) and survival methods (fast survival SVM, Cox regression and random survival forest). ResultsA total of 3687 participants experienced cardiovascular mortality and 12,841 participants had IHD-related hospitalisation over a median follow-up of 10.4 years and 11.6 years respectively. The best model for cardiovascular mortality was a Cox survival regression with L1 penalty at a re-sampled case/non-case ratio of 0.3 achieved by under-sampling of the non-cases. This model had the Uno's and Harrel's concordance indexes of 0.898 and 0.900 respectively. The best model for IHD hospitalisation was a Cox survival regression with L1 penalty at a re-sampled case/non-case ratio of 1.0 with Uno's and Harrel's concordance indexes of 0.711 and 0.718 respectively. ConclusionMachine learning-based risk prediction models developed using self-reported questionnaire data had good prediction performance. These models may have the potential to be used in initial screening tests to identify high-risk individuals before undergoing costly investigation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call