Abstract

Behavioural studies of elusive wildlife species are challenging but important when they are threatened and involved in human-wildlife conflicts. Accelerometers (ACCs) and supervised machine learning algorithms (MLAs) are valuable tools to remotely determine behaviours. Here we used five captive cheetahs in Namibia to test the applicability of ACC data in identifying six behaviours by using six MLAs on data we ground-truthed by direct observations. We included two ensemble learning approaches and a probability threshold to improve prediction accuracy. We used the model to then identify the behaviours in four free-ranging cheetah males. Feeding behaviours identified by the model and matched with corresponding GPS clusters were verified with previously identified kill sites in the field. The MLAs and the two ensemble learning approaches in the captive cheetahs achieved precision (recall) ranging from 80.1% to 100.0% (87.3% to 99.2%) for resting, walking and trotting/running behaviour, from 74.4% to 81.6% (54.8% and 82.4%) for feeding behaviour and from 0.0% to 97.1% (0.0% and 56.2%) for drinking and grooming behaviour. The model application to the ACC data of the free-ranging cheetahs successfully identified all nine kill sites and 17 of the 18 feeding events of the two brother groups. We demonstrated that our behavioural model reliably detects feeding events of free-ranging cheetahs. This has useful applications for the determination of cheetah kill sites and helping to mitigate human-cheetah conflicts.

Highlights

  • One of the most complex aspects to study in animals is their behaviour [1]

  • Confusion matrices for all algorithms with the 0.5 probability threshold are in the appendix (Appendix A Tables A2–A9). Adding this threshold to the leave-oneout cross-validation (LOOCV) increased the performance of the model, in predicting feeding behaviour by the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm by simultaneously only missing 5.4% of true feeding bursts by labeling them as “not conclusive” (Appendix A Table A1)

  • While the six machine learning algorithms (MLAs) (LDA, quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), k-nearest neighbour (KNN), classification and regression tree (CART), SVM, random forest (RF)) differed in their success in predicting each behaviour, we found the two ensemble learning approaches to be the most promising ones to overall improve precision and recall and a good compromise for the successful identification of the six behaviours

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most complex aspects to study in animals is their behaviour [1]. Understanding species-specific behaviour is essential for their management, welfare and conservation [2,3,4,5,6]. ACCs measure the change in velocity of the sensors attached to the body and allow translation of the quantified movement patterns into distinct behavioural categories or activities [13]. This technique has been successfully used for a variety of bird species [15,16,17,18,19], marine animals [20,21,22,23], and terrestrial mammals [24,25,26,27,28], including cheetahs, Acinonyx jubatus [29,30,31,32]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call