Abstract

Scientific models represent ideas, processes, and phenomena by describing important components, characteristics, and interactions. Models are constructed across a variety of scientific disciplines, such as the food web in biology, the water cycle in Earth science, or the structure of the solar system in astronomy. Models are central for scientists to understand phenomena, construct explanations, and communicate theories. Constructing and using models to explain scientific phenomena is also an essential practice in contemporary science classrooms. Our research explores new techniques for understanding scientific modeling and engagement with modeling practices. We work with students in secondary biology classrooms as they use a web-based software tool - EcoSurvey - to characterize organisms and their interrelationships found in their local ecosystem. We use learning analytics and machine learning techniques to answer the following questions: 1) How can we automatically measure the extent to which students’ scientific models support complete explanations of phenomena? 2) How does the design of student modeling tools influence the complexity and completeness of students’ models? 3) How do clickstreams reflect and differentiate student engagement with modeling practices? We analyzed EcoSurvey usage data collected from two different deployments with over 1000 secondary students across a large urban school district. We observe large variations in the completeness and complexity of student models, and large variations in their iterative refinement processes. These differences reveal that certain key model features are highly predictive of other aspects of the model. We also observe large differences in student modeling practices across different classrooms and teachers. We can predict a student’s teacher based on the observed modeling practices with a high degree of accuracy without significant tuning of the predictive model. These results highlight the value of this approach for extending our understanding of student engagement with scientific modeling, an important contemporary science practice, as well as the potential value of analytics for identifying critical differences in classroom implementation.

Highlights

  • Scientific models represent ideas, processes, and phenomena by describing important components, their characteristics, and their interactions

  • We study the development of student modeling practices using digital modeling tools in secondary biology classrooms

  • We saw improvements in the completeness and complexity of students’ models, suggesting benefits from improvements in modeling tool design. These results highlight the value of this approach for extending our understanding of student engagement with scientific modeling, as well as the potential value of analytics for identifying critical differences in classroom implementation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scientific models represent ideas, processes, and phenomena by describing important components, their characteristics, and their interactions. Models are central to the work of scientists for understanding. Learning Analytics for Scientific Modeling phenomena, and for constructing and communicating theories. Constructing and using models to explain scientific phenomena is an essential practice in contemporary science classrooms. In A Framework for K–12 Science Education (National Research, 2012), developing and using models is one of the eight core practices deemed essential for science learning and instruction. To represent their current understanding of a system (or parts of a system) under study, to aid in the development of questions and explanations, to generate data that can be used to make predictions, and to communicate ideas to others” (National Research, 2012) According to the Framework, “[s]cientists use models... to represent their current understanding of a system (or parts of a system) under study, to aid in the development of questions and explanations, to generate data that can be used to make predictions, and to communicate ideas to others” (National Research, 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.