Abstract

Despite evidence that leaf temperatures can differ by several degrees from the air, crop simulation models are generally parameterised with air temperatures. Leaf energy budget is a process-based approach that can be used to link climate and physiological processes of plants, but this approach has rarely been used in crop modelling studies. In this study, a controlled environment experiment was used to validate the use of the leaf energy budget approach to calculate leaf temperature for perennial pasture species, and a modelling approach was developed utilising leaf temperature instead of air temperature to achieve a better representation of heat stress impacts on pasture growth in a biophysical model. The controlled environment experiment assessed the impact of two combined seven-day heat (control = 25/15 °C, day/night, moderate = 30/20 °C, day/night, and severe = 35/25 °C, day/night) and drought stresses (with seven-day recovery period between stress periods) on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). The leaf temperature of each species was modelled by using leaf energy budget equation and validated with measured data. All species showed limited homeothermy with the slope of 0.88 (P < 0.05) suggesting that pasture plants can buffer temperature variations in their growing environment. The DairyMod biophysical model was used to simulate photosynthesis during each treatment, using both air and leaf temperatures, and the patterns were compared with measured data using a response ratio (effect size compared to the well-watered control). The effect size of moderate heat and well-watered treatment was very similar to the measured values (~0.65) when simulated using T leaf, while T air overestimated the consecutive heat stress impacts (0.4 and 0). These results were used to test the heat stress recovery function (Tsum) of perennial ryegrass in DairyMod, finding that recovery after heat stress was well reproduced when parameterized with T sum = 20, while T sum = 50 simulated a long lag phase. Long term pasture growth rate simulations under irrigated conditions in south eastern Australia using leaf temperatures predicted 6–34% and 14–126% higher pasture growth rates, respectively at Ellinbank and Dookie, during late spring and summer months compared to the simulations using air temperatures. This study demonstrated that the simulation of consecutive heat and/or drought stress impacts on pasture production, using DairyMod, can be improved by using leaf temperatures instead of air temperature.

Highlights

  • IntroductionPlants 2020, 9, 8 the pasture growth patterns under future climate change reported by [3,4] are already occurring under current climate change, including increased pasture yield variability over the major growing seasons (autumn and spring) and a decreased spring season growth leading to shorter growing season lengths [5]

  • Climate change projections for Australia indicate increasing frequency and magnitude of extreme climate events such as heat waves, droughts, extreme precipitation and frost occurrences in the coming decades [1], which are likely to reduce productivity and profitability of pasture-based systems [2].A recent study conducted in southeastern (SE) Australia showed that the anticipated changes to Plants 2020, 9, 8; doi:10.3390/plants9010008 www.mdpi.com/journal/plantsPlants 2020, 9, 8 the pasture growth patterns under future climate change reported by [3,4] are already occurring under current climate change, including increased pasture yield variability over the major growing seasons and a decreased spring season growth leading to shorter growing season lengths [5]

  • This slope was significantly less than 1 (P = 0.001) and greater than 0 (P < 0.001) (Figure 1), the pasture species used in this study would be classified as limited homeotherms, with the ability to buffer leaf temperature against the variation in the ambient air temperature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plants 2020, 9, 8 the pasture growth patterns under future climate change reported by [3,4] are already occurring under current climate change, including increased pasture yield variability over the major growing seasons (autumn and spring) and a decreased spring season growth leading to shorter growing season lengths [5]. These changes were more prominent in the most recent period (2002–2015) compared to the periods before and were mainly caused by the increased occurrences of heat and drought stress [5]. Since high temperature stress often coincides with moisture limitation under field conditions, the combined impacts could be over and above the effects of individual stresses [13,14,19]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call