Using L1 tone and intonation categories to investigate patterns in nonnative tone identification

Abstract

Many languages utilise lexical tone, a feature which assigns meaning to words through variations in pitch contours. In some (but not all) cases, prior tone language experience can facilitate the learning of a nonnative tone language. Regardless, multiple sessions of tone training can improve nonnative tone perception for both tone and nontone L1 listeners. However, the influence of L1 tone and intonation categories on nonnative tone learning is underexplored. Across five sessions of tone training, listeners of nontonal English (n = 25), tonal Mandarin (n = 23), and tonal Vietnamese (n = 25) learned tones from an artificial language. While all groups improved in tone identification and tone word learning by session five (p < .001), Mandarin listeners outperformed the other groups overall (identification, p < .001; word learning, p < .05). Tone experience was a main effect only in word learning (p < .05). Tone- and language-specific identification patterns were also observed. The low level tone was easier for all listeners to perceive, while the tonal groups also showed greater accuracy for the mid level tone. Contrastingly, Mandarin listeners were hindered by their single L1 falling tone category when attempting to identify two distinct nonnative falling tones.