Abstract

Individual personalities affect animal experiences of zoo environments, impact on an animal’s coping ability and have potential implications for welfare. Keeper assessments have been identified as a quick and reliable way of capturing data on personality in a range of species and have practical application in improving animal welfare on an individual level. Despite widespread recognition of the importance of animal personality within a zoo environment, there is a paucity of research into tiger personality and the potential impact of this on tiger experiences within zoos. This research investigated the personality of 34 tigers (19 Amur and 15 Sumatran) across 14 facilities in the UK using keeper ratings and identified changes keepers made in animal husbandry to support tiger welfare. Reliability across keepers (n = 49) was established for nine adjectives and a principal component analysis identified three personality components: ‘anxious’, ‘quiet’ and ‘sociable’. When subspecies were combined, there was no relationship between tiger scores on the personality components and age or sex of tigers (p > 0.05). Subspecies of tiger was not related to scores on the ‘quiet’ or ‘sociable’ components (p > 0.05). Sumatran tigers scored more highly than Amur tigers on the ‘anxious’ component (mean ± SD, Sumatran: 3.0 ± 1.7, Amur: 1.8 ± 0.6, p < 0.05). Analysis within subspecies found that male Amur tigers were more sociable than females (mean ± SD, males: 5.5 ± 0.707; females: 4.15 ± 0.55). Amur tiger age was also negatively correlated with scores on the sociable personality component (R = −0.742, p < 0.05). No significant differences were seen in Sumatran tigers. Keepers reported a number of changes to husbandry routines based on their perceptions of their tigers’ personality/needs. However, there was no significant relationship between these changes and tiger personality scores (p > 0.05). Despite significant evolutionary differences between Amur and Sumatran tigers, there are no subspecies specific guidelines for zoo tigers. This research has highlighted the potential for these two subspecies to display personality differences and we advocate further research into this area. Specifically, we highlight a need to validate the relationship between tiger personality, management protocols and behavioural and physiological metrics of welfare. This will enable a fuller understanding of the impact of personality on zoo tiger experiences and will enable identification of evidence-based best practice guidelines.

Highlights

  • Tigers, Asia’s largest apex predator, are categorised as ‘endangered’ on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species

  • 50% of the surveyed keepers reportedmaking makingmodifications modificationstototheir theirhusbandry husbandryprotocols protocolsbased basedon ontiger tigerpersonality; personality; reported there was no relationship between tiger personality and presence/absence there was no relationship between tiger personality and presence/absence ofof specifichusbandry husbandryprotocols protocolswithin withinfacilities

  • Understanding and applying knowledge of animal personality is an important area for consideration to ensure evidence-based zoological management

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Asia’s largest apex predator, are categorised as ‘endangered’ on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species. Occurring in a range of habitats including forest, shrubland and grassland [1], there is a paucity of information on tiger behaviour in-situ, predominantly due to their relatively secretive nature [2]. There have been many taxonomic revisions of tiger subspecies in recent years, with scientists and researchers identifying four [5], eight [6], two [7] and six extant subspecies of tiger [8]. Armstrong et al [9] identified at least four genetically distinct subspecies from around the world (Amur tigers (Panthera tigris altaica), Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris tigris), Malayan tigers (Panthera tigris jacksoni) and Sumatran tigers (Panthera tigris sondaica)).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.