Abstract

Abstract Water resource managers are required to develop comprehensive water resources plans based on severely uncertain information of the effects of climate change on local hydrology and future socio-economic changes on localised demand. In England and Wales, current water resources planning methodologies include a headroom estimation process separate from water resource simulation modelling. This process quantifies uncertainty based on only one point of an assumed range of deviations from the expected climate and projected demand 25 years into the future. This paper utilises an integrated method based on Information-Gap decision theory to quantitatively assess the robustness of various supply side and demand side management options over a broad range of plausible futures. Findings show that beyond the uncertainty range explored with the headroom method, a preference reversal can occur, i.e. some management options that underperform at lower uncertainties, outperform at higher levels of uncertainty. This study also shows that when 50 % or more of the population adopts demand side management, efficiency related measures and innovative options such as rainwater collection can perform equally well or better than some supply side options The additional use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis shifts the focus away from reservoir expansion options, that perform best in regards to water availability, to combined strategies that include innovative demand side management actions of rainwater collection and greywater reuse as well efficiency measures and additional regional transfers. This paper illustrates how an Information-Gap based approach can offer a comprehensive picture of potential supply/demand futures and a rich variety of information to support adaptive management of water systems under severe uncertainty.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThis paper introduces a new water resources planning methodology based on InformationGap (shortened to Info-Gap) decision theory

  • This paper introduces a new water resources planning methodology based on InformationGap decision theory

  • The effects of future emission scenarios drive future global weather patterns represented by different Global Climate Models (GCMs); GCMs are downscaled by Regional Climate Models (RCMs); from RCM variables the effects on local hydrology are assessed by a variety of impact models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper introduces a new water resources planning methodology based on InformationGap (shortened to Info-Gap) decision theory. Info-Gap decision theory (Ben-Haim 2001) offers a method to sample a wider range of uncertainty than with traditional methods, and as a result, evaluate the performance of various water resource management options under conditions of severe uncertainty. This information on how different management interventions succeed over a range of futures makes it possible to be prepared to adapt should circumstance change from what is expected. A conclusion section (5) emphasises the main benefits and limitations of using Info-Gap and future research directions

Sources of Uncertainty in Water Resources Planning
Characterising and Quantifying Uncertainty with the EBSD Approach
Uncertainty Characterisation and Quantification
Identify Robust Management Strategies Using MCDA
Description
Uncertainty Sources
Water Resource management options
Results and Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call