Abstract

Atractylodes lancea (AL) is argued to be the best botanical source of the atractylodes rhizome (AR), which is used within traditional Chinese medicine. However, in recent years there have been a number of issues around the production and use of AR, including authenticity, confusion, and mislabeling between AL and Atractylodes chinensis (AC) isolates, geographical origins, and production modes. These discrepancies can impact both the quality and commercial value of the crop. In this study, volatile organic compounds from 173 batches of AR isolated from both AL and AC plants were compared using a flash gas chromatography electronic nose (flash GC e-nose) and headspace gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS). The flash GC e-nose revealed that the main aromas of AR were spicy, sweety, and fruity, and the flavor differences of Atractylodes lancea from different geographical origins are mainly reflected in sweetness and spicy taste. Furthermore, HS-GC-MS showed that terpenoids are key indicators for determining the quality and further clarifying the origin of AL. Eight terpenoids including 2-pinen-10-ol and β-elemene were higher in abundance in AL than AC; seven terpenoids including α-curcumene and α-pinene were higher in abundance in wild AL than cultivated AL; and there were significantly different quantities of ten terpenoids including agarospirol and β-bisabolene present in samples of AL taken from Jiangsu, Henan and Hubei provinces. Finally, the performance of eight machine-learning algorithms to distinguish between AL and AC, and recognize different regions and production patterns of AL, were compared. Among them, XGBoost had the highest differentiation accuracy of 86.17 ± 7.48%. This study provides a rapid and accurate strategy for addressing quality control and market regulation issues for AL and other industrial crops.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call