Abstract
To target food security interventions for smallholder households, decision makers need large-scale information, such as maps on poverty, food security and key livelihood activities. Such information is often based on expert knowledge or aggregated data, despite the fact that food security and poverty are driven largely by processes at the household level. At present, it is unclear if and how household level information can contribute to the spatial prediction of such welfare indicators or to what extent local variability is ignored by current mapping efforts. A combination of geo-referenced household level information with spatially continuous information is an underused approach to quantify local and large-scale variation, while it can provide a direct estimate of the variability of welfare indicators at the most relevant scale. We applied a stepwise regression kriging procedure to translate point information to spatially explicit patterns and create country-wide predictions with associated uncertainty estimates for indicators on food availability and related livelihood activities using household survey data from Uganda. With few exceptions, predictions of the indicators were weak, highlighting the difficulty in capturing variability at larger scale. Household explanatory variables identified little additional variation compared to environmental explanatory variables alone. Spatial predictability was strongest for indicators whose distribution was determined by environmental gradients. In contrast, indicators of crops that were more ubiquitously present across agroecological zones showed large local variation, which often overruled large-scale patterns.Our procedure adds to existing approaches that often only show large-scale patterns by revealing that local variation in welfare is large. Interventions that aim to target the poor must recognise that diversity in livelihood activities for income generation within any given area often overrides the variability of livelihood activities between distant regions in the country.
Highlights
Smallholder farming is the basis of living for many of the most vulnerable on earth [1] and one of the most common forms of agriculture worldwide [2]
The prediction map was added to the backtransformed median of the interpolated residuals, lower 95% bound of the prediction interval (PI) and upper 95% PI of the interpolated residuals
The remaining unexplained variation in the household data could be related to other household characteristics affecting food security, for example education level and age of the household head, social capital or access to market information [41,42,43], which we did not consider in the analysis
Summary
Smallholder farming is the basis of living for many of the most vulnerable on earth [1] and one of the most common forms of agriculture worldwide [2]. There is a strong link of smallholder farming with poverty, malnutrition and hunger of the rural population [3], so that targeting interventions on smallholder farming is important for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 2 (Zero Hunger) of the United Nations. Decision makers need large-scale quantitative information, such as displayed in maps, for targeting interventions, assessing vulnerability of rural households to poverty and food insecurity, and for planning emergency relief. Maps on poverty and food security are often derived from aggregated information or based on expert knowledge. Expert-based aggregation masks [4] were typically used. Recent more advanced approaches using machine learning to predict the distribution of poverty from satellite imagery [5] have relied on aggregated household data. Poverty and food security tend to be locally driven processes with large variation at small scale, for example between nearby households [6]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.