Abstract

BackgroundVerbal autopsy is the main method used in countries with weak civil registration systems for estimating community causes of neonatal and 1–59-month-old deaths. However, validation studies of verbal autopsy methods are limited and assessment has been dependent on hospital-based studies, with uncertain implications for its validity in community settings. If the distribution of community deaths by cause was similar to that of facility deaths, or could be adjusted according to related demographic factors, then the causes of facility deaths could be used to estimate population causes.MethodsCauses of neonatal and 1–59-month-old deaths from verbal/social autopsy (VASA) surveys in four African countries were estimated using expert algorithms (EAVA) and physician coding (PCVA). Differences between facility and community deaths in individual causes and cause distributions were examined using chi-square and cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMF) accuracy, respectively. Multinomial logistic regression and random forest models including factors from the VASA studies that are commonly available in Demographic and Health Surveys were built to predict population causes from facility deaths.ResultsLevels of facility and community deaths in the four countries differed for one to four of 10 EAVA or PCVA neonatal causes and zero to three of 12 child causes. CSMF accuracy for facility compared to community deaths in the four countries ranged from 0.74 to 0.87 for neonates and 0.85 to 0.95 for 1–59-month-olds. Crude CSMF accuracy in the prediction models averaged 0.86 to 0.88 for neonates and 0.93 for 1–59-month-olds. Adjusted random forest prediction models increased average CSMF accuracy for neonates to, at most, 0.90, based on small increases in all countries.ConclusionsThere were few differences in facility and community causes of neonatal and 1–59-month-old deaths in the four countries, and it was possible to project the population CSMF from facility deaths with accuracy greater than the validity of verbal autopsy diagnoses. Confirmation of these findings in additional settings would warrant research into how medical causes of deaths in a representative sample of health facilities can be utilized to estimate the population causes of child death.

Highlights

  • Verbal autopsy is the main method used in countries with weak civil registration systems for estimating community causes of neonatal and 1–59-month-old deaths

  • The Physician-coded verbal autopsy (PCVA) analysis was conducted by one welltrained local physician (FN, GK, A-Mortality fraction (MR), and WAA, respectively, in Cameroon, Malawi, Niger, and Nigeria) employing pre-defined required minimal diagnostic criteria combined with their clinical judgment

  • We modeled neonatal and 1– 59-month causes of death using multinomial logistic regression (MLR) [29] and random forests (RF) [30] to adjust for the potential influence of several factors on the community and health facility causes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Verbal autopsy is the main method used in countries with weak civil registration systems for estimating community causes of neonatal and 1–59-month-old deaths. Accurate information on the causes of neonatal and child mortality is needed to help prioritize health expenditures and shape effective health policies and programs in developing countries. It is a long-held assumption in the international public health literature that the causes of child deaths in health facilities, mainly hospital, differ from those that occur in the community [1, 2]. Arises the need for verbal autopsy (VA), the widely used and generally accepted best available method for estimating cause of death at the population level in settings with inadequate medical certification, until such time as functioning CRVS systems are put in place

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call