Abstract

General practice is often a patient’s first point of contact with the health system and the gateway to specialist services. In Australia, different aspects of the health system are managed by the Commonwealth Government and individual state / territory governments. Although there is a long history of research using administrative data in Australia, this split in the management and funding of services has hindered whole-system research. Additionally, the administrative data typically available for research are often collected for reimbursement purposes and lack clinical information.General practices collect a range of patient information including diagnoses, medications prescribed, results of pathology tests ordered and so on. Practices are increasingly using clinical information systems and data extraction tools to make use of this information. This paper describes approaches used on several research projects to access clinical, as opposed to administrative, general practice data which to date has seen little use as a resource for research.This information was accessed in three ways. The first was by working directly with practices to access clinical and management data to support research. The second involved accessing general practice data through collaboration with Primary Health Networks, recently established in Australia to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of health services for patients. The third was via NPS MedicineWise’s MedicineInsight program, which collects data from consenting practices across Australia and makes these data available to researchers.We describe each approach including data access requirements and the advantages and challenges of each method. All approaches provide the opportunity to better understand data previously unavailable for research in Australia. The challenge of linking general practice data to other sources, currently being explored for general practice data, is discussed.Finally, we describe some general practice data collections used for research internationally and how these compare to collections available in Australia.

Highlights

  • Health systems produce large volumes of data and these data are increasingly created and stored in digital formats [1]

  • We describe other Australian collections that we are aware of; and provide comparisons to the United Kingdom (UK)’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Wales’ Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank, which represent ‘gold standards’ in general practice data collections

  • Within Australia there is extensive population-level administrative data captured on the use of health and other services

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Health systems produce large volumes of data and these data are increasingly created and stored in digital formats [1]. Such data can be an invaluable tool both for patient care and research. This paper adds to a limited body of evidence regarding the utility and availability of clinical general practice data for research in Australia. This is based on our experience of working with different sources of general practice data, which we have accessed through different approaches.

Background
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call