USING FISH TO SAMPLE DIATOM COMPOSITION IN STREAMS: ARE INTESTINAL FLORAS REPRESENTATIVE OF NATURAL SUBSTRATES?

Abstract

Sellman, S. M., Johansen, J. R. & Coburn, M. M.Department of Biology, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH 44118 USAThe diatom composition of natural substrates at a single site were compared with that of the gut contents of three species of fish: stoneroller minnows, bluntnose minnows, and common shiners. Seven samples of each type were collected on a single day from a single pool in a headwater stream. Cluster analysis showed that diatom species composition clustered by fish species, with common shiners being a totally exclusive cluster, while natural substrates were scattered within the stoneroller and bluntnose clusters. Both richness and Shannon diversity were higher in fish gut samples than in the samples collected by humans, with stonerollers having the greatest diversity. When water quality indices calculated from the diatom floras recovered in these samples were compared, it was surprising to see that these indices consistently were better in fish gut samples than in samples collected by researchers. Common shiners particularly differed, a result possibly due to the fact that they apparently fed off of Cladophora and the highly oxygenated rock wall where the stream cascaded into the pool. In no case was the difference between stonerollers and natural substrates significantly different. Furthermore, samples from natural substrates had an internal similarity not significantly different from their similarity to samples in stoneroller and bluntnose guts. Our data thus consistently indicate that stoneroller minnows are excellent samplers that efficiently collect diverse, representative diatom samples.