Abstract

Recent research found that the languages of bilingual listeners are active and interact, such that both lexical representations are activated by the spoken input with which they are compatible. However, the time course of bilingual activation and whether suprasegmental information further modulates this cross-language competition are still not well understood. This study investigates the effect of stress placement on the processing of English–Spanish cognates by beginner-to-intermediate Spanish-speaking second-language (L2) learners of English and intermediate-to-advanced English-speaking L2 learners of Spanish using the visual-world eye-tracking paradigm. In each trial, participants saw a target (asado, ‘roast’), one of two competitors (stress match: asados, ‘roast (pl)’; stress mismatch: asador, ‘rotisserie’), and two unrelated distracters, while hearing the target word. The experiment included a non-cognate condition (asado-asados-asador) and a cognate condition, where the stress pattern of the English word corresponding to the Spanish competitor in the stress-mismatch condition (inventor) instead matched that of the Spanish target (invento, ‘invent’). Growth-curve analyses revealed cognate-status and stress-mismatch effects for Spanish-speaking L2 learners of English, and cognate-status and stress-mismatch effects, and an interaction for English-speaking L2 learners of Spanish. This suggests that both groups use stress for word recognition, but the English stress pattern only affects the processing of Spanish words in the English-speaking L2 learners of Spanish.

Highlights

  • IntroductionResearch done in the past 25 years has shown that bilinguals, including simultaneous bilinguals as well as early and late second-language (L2) learners, activate words in both of their languages even when they consciously intend to use only one language (e.g., Blumenfeld and Marian 2011; Canseco-Gonzalez et al 2010; Desmet and Duyck 2007; Dijkstra 2005; Marian and Spivey 2003a, 2003b; Schulpen et al 2003; Weber and Cutler 2004)

  • All four conditions were necessary to answer the research questions because we evaluate the difference in competition between the stress-match and stress-mismatch conditions to see whether this difference is smaller in the cognate condition than in the non-cognate condition

  • The results of the Growth curve analysis (GCA) with the best fit on native Spanish participants’ differential proportions of fixations in all conditions showed a three-way interaction between stress, cognate status, and the linear polynomial (Estimate = −0.163, SE = 0.059, p < 0.01) as well as a three-way interaction between stress, cognate status, and the quadratic polynomial (Estimate = −0.176, SE = 0.059, p < 0.01), so follow-up analyses were run on the two cognate conditions separately

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research done in the past 25 years has shown that bilinguals, including simultaneous bilinguals as well as early and late second-language (L2) learners, activate words in both of their languages even when they consciously intend to use only one language (e.g., Blumenfeld and Marian 2011; Canseco-Gonzalez et al 2010; Desmet and Duyck 2007; Dijkstra 2005; Marian and Spivey 2003a, 2003b; Schulpen et al 2003; Weber and Cutler 2004). For bilinguals, as a spoken word in the speech signal unfolds, lexical candidates that most closely match the input in the intended language, and words in the unintended language, become partially activated and compete for recognition. When listening to the word “material” (in English), and before it becomes fully activated, the listener is going to partially activate all those words consistent with the acoustic input in an incremental way

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.