Abstract
Orientation: Exploratory factor analysis is the method of choice with objective personality instruments, particularly to establish the construct validity and construct equivalence of trait-based instruments.Research purpose: This article presents more objective methods to determine the number of factors, most notably parallel analysis and Velicer’s minimum average partial (MAP). The benefits of rotation are also discussed. The article argues for more consistent use of Procrustes rotation and congruence coefficients in factor analytic studies.Motivation for the study: Exploratory factor analysis is often criticised for not being rigorous and objective enough in terms of the methods used to determine the number of factors, the rotations to be used and ultimately the validity of the factor structure.Research design, approach and method: The article adopts a theoretical stance to discuss the best-practice recommendations for factor analytic research in the field of psychology. Following this, an example located within personality assessment and using the NEO-PI-R specifically is presented. A total of 425 students at the University of the Witwatersrand completed the NEO-PI-R. These responses were subjected to a principal components analysis using varimax rotation. The rotated solution was subjected to a Procrustes rotation with Costa and McCrae’s (1992) matrix as the target matrix. Congruence coefficients were also computed.Main findings: The example indicates the use of the methods recommended in the article and demonstrates an objective way of determining the number of factors. It also provides an example of Procrustes rotation with coefficients of agreement as an indication of how factor analytic results may be presented more rigorously in local research.Practical/managerial implications: It is hoped that the recommendations in this article will have best-practice implications for both researchers and practitioners in the field who employ factor analysis regularly.Contribution/value-add: This article will prove useful to all researchers employing factor analysis and has the potential to set the trend for better use of factor analysis in the South African context.
Highlights
Personality tests are among the most frequently used tests in South Africa
The Employment Equity Act (Republic of South Africa, 1998) states that all tests used in South Africa must be proven to be scientifically reliable, valid and fair
This article discussed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the various decisions and techniques associated with it primarily as they pertain to objective personality tests. This was done to promote best practice in the South African context when EFA is employed in research and/or practice
Summary
Personality tests are among the most frequently used tests in South Africa (see Foxcroft, Paterson, Le Roux & Herbst, 2004). In order to do this, researchers often determine the internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the instrument. Internal consistency reliability is an objective procedure determined by Cronbach’s alpha or Kuder-Richardson coefficients (Moerdyk, 2009; Murphy & Davidshofer, 2005). The equality of reliability coefficients across two groups can be calculated and provides an objective indication of statistical differences in reliability coefficients across groups. 60), ‘the statistic to test the equality of two independent reliability coefficients is (1- α1)/(1- α2)’, where α1 and α2 represent the reliabilities (usually Cronbach’s α) of an instrument in two different groups. An F distribution with degrees of freedom N1–1 and N2–1, where N1 and N2 are the sample sizes of each group respectively, is used to determine the significance of the difference between the two reliability coefficients. In establishing construct validity and construct equivalence, the methods used are not as clear cut
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
