Abstract

ABSTRACT Advancing the state of the art in oil pollution prevention and response requires the identification of missing elements and developing research to fill in the gaps in information. Researchers rely on a wide range of methods to identify new areas for study. Previous research frequently identifies new questions that could not be addressed at the time, or were outside the scope of the study. Lessons learned during response to real events also provide valuable insights. However, Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP) and Homeland Security Exercise Evaluation Program (HSEEP) exercises are often overlooked as a source of new ideas for research. Exercises are widely used to identify emergency response capabilities, to test equipment, practice response protocols, and to train personnel in their duties. This paper presents a review of selected After Action Reports (AARs) from PREP and HSEEP oil spill exercises to determine the extent that new research ideas could be gleaned from the information and the extent that research opportunities were identified. This paper also addresses factors that limit the utility of exercises for identifying research needs. These limiting factors include the exercise purpose, exercise design, evaluation criteria, and after action reporting protocols. Practical suggestions on approaches to considering research needs during the exercises are provided.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call