Abstract
We lookat three variants of the boosting algorithm called here Aggressive Boosting, Conservative Boosting and Inverse Boosting. We associate the diversity measure Q with the accuracy during the progressive development of the ensembles, in the hope of being able to detect the point of paralysis of the training, if any. Three data sets are used: the artificial Cone-Torus data and the UCI Pima Indian Diabetes data and the Phoneme data. We run each of the three Boosting variants with two base classifier models: the quadratic classifier and a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network. The three variants show different behavior, favoring in most cases the Conservative Boosting
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
