Abstract
BackgroundAdaptive movement behaviors allow individuals to respond to fluctuations in resource quality and distribution in order to maintain fitness. Classically, studies of the interaction between ecological conditions and movement behavior have focused on such metrics as travel distance, velocity, home range size or patch occupancy time as the salient metrics of behavior. Driven by the emergence of very regular high frequency data, more recently the importance of interpreting the autocorrelation structure of movement as a behavioral metric has become apparent. Studying movement of a free ranging African savannah elephant population, we evaluated how two movement metrics, diel displacement (DD) and movement predictability (MP - the degree of autocorrelated movement activity at diel time scales), changed in response to variation in resource availability as measured by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. We were able to capitalize on long term (multi-year) yet high resolution (hourly) global positioning system tracking datasets, the sample size of which allows robust analysis of complex models. We use optimal foraging theory predictions as a framework to interpret our results, in particular contrasting the behaviors across changes in social rank and resource availability to infer which movement behaviors at diel time scales may be optimal in this highly social species.ResultsBoth DD and MP increased with increasing forage availability, irrespective of rank, reflecting increased energy expenditure and movement predictability during time periods of overall high resource availability. However, significant interactions between forage availability and social rank indicated a stronger response in DD, and a weaker response in MP, with increasing social status.ConclusionsRelative to high ranking individuals, low ranking individuals expended more energy and exhibited less behavioral movement autocorrelation during lower forage availability conditions, likely reflecting sub-optimal movement behavior. Beyond situations of contest competition, rank status appears to influence the extent to which individuals can modify their movement strategies across periods with differing forage availability. Large-scale spatiotemporal resource complexity not only impacts fine scale movement and optimal foraging strategies directly, but likely impacts rates of inter- and intra-specific interactions and competition resulting in socially based movement responses to ecological dynamics.
Highlights
Adaptive movement behaviors allow individuals to respond to fluctuations in resource quality and distribution in order to maintain fitness
Summary statistics across all individuals (Figure 2a), or by each individual separately (Figure 2b), indicate a positive association between diel displacement (DD) and forage availability as measured by Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data aggregated for the ecosystem
We found that all individuals in this population increased their DD with increased forage availability in the study system and that social rank status significantly interacted with NDVI to influence the rate of these changes: increases in rank, in general, led to larger changes in DD and smaller changes in movement predictability (MP) as forage availability increased
Summary
Adaptive movement behaviors allow individuals to respond to fluctuations in resource quality and distribution in order to maintain fitness. We use optimal foraging theory predictions as a framework to interpret our results, in particular contrasting the behaviors across changes in social rank and resource availability to infer which movement behaviors at diel time scales may be optimal in this highly social species. Understanding how fine-scale movement changes in response to different spatial and temporal scales of resource fluctuations offers an approach to evaluate how animals respond to dynamic resource landscapes in order to maximize fitness [2]. By contrasting social rank related differences in fine scale movements, it may be possible to better infer the relative constraints and drivers of optimal movement behavior as a function of ecosystem variables. Few studies have quantified how the interaction between social status and ecosystem properties structures differences in individual movement behaviors
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.