Abstract

Brain coding strategies are enabled by the balance of synaptic inputs that individual neurons receive as determined by the networks in which they reside. Inhibitory cell types contribute to brain function in distinct ways but recording from specific, inhibitory cell types during behaviour to determine their contributions is highly challenging. In particular, the in vivo activities of vasoactive intestinal peptide-expressing interneuron specific 3 (IS3) cells in the hippocampus that only target other inhibitory cells are unknown at present. We perform a massive, computational exploration of possible synaptic inputs to IS3 cells using multi-compartment models and optimized synaptic parameters. We find that asynchronous, in vivo-like states that are sensitive to additional theta-timed inputs (8 Hz) exist when excitatory and inhibitory synaptic conductances are approximately equally balanced and with low numbers of activated synapses receiving correlated inputs. Specifically, under these balanced conditions, the input resistance is larger with higher mean spike firing rates relative to other activated synaptic conditions investigated. Incoming theta-timed inputs result in strongly increased spectral power relative to baseline. Thus, using a generally applicable computational approach we predict the existence and features of background, balanced states in hippocampal circuits.

Highlights

  • A dizzying array of morphological, molecular, and electrophysiological details for different cell types exist and appropriate classifications are being determined [1]

  • Our models are detailed in terms of morphology and the inclusion of four types of ion channels, and we used two variant interneuron specific 3 (IS3) cell models

  • We found that the representative scenario from pool LLLL was consistently in vivo-like (IVL) for both the AType+ and AType- models for most of the re-done simulations, and when it was not, it was due to the interspike interval coefficient of variation (ISICV) dipping a bit below the chosen threshold

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A dizzying array of morphological, molecular, and electrophysiological details for different cell types exist and appropriate classifications are being determined [1]. How these different cell types contribute to brain function is challenging to determine, but it is clear that a homeostatic balance of cell excitability, together with excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs is essential for normal brain function [2,3,4,5]. The irregular firing of neurons in vivo is well-known and is believed to confer computational benefits, with inhibition being recognized as a crucial shaper of these asynchronous activities [6, 7]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call