Abstract

BackgroundChronic diseases affect 52% of Americans and consume 86% of health care costs. A small portion of patients consume most health care resources and costs. More intensive patient management strategies, such as case management, are usually more effective at improving health outcomes, but are also more expensive. To use limited resources efficiently, risk stratification is commonly used in managing patients with chronic diseases, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and heart disease. Patients are stratified based on predicted risk with patients at higher risk given more intensive care. The current risk-stratified patient management approach has 3 limitations resulting in many patients not receiving the most appropriate care, unnecessarily increased costs, and suboptimal health outcomes. First, using predictive models for health outcomes and costs is currently the best method for forecasting individual patient’s risk. Yet, accuracy of predictive models remains poor causing many patients to be misstratified. If an existing model were used to identify candidate patients for case management, enrollment would miss more than half of those who would benefit most, but include others unlikely to benefit, wasting limited resources. Existing models have been developed under the assumption that patient characteristics primarily influence outcomes and costs, leaving physician characteristics out of the models. In reality, both characteristics have an impact. Second, existing models usually give neither an explanation why a particular patient is predicted to be at high risk nor suggestions on interventions tailored to the patient’s specific case. As a result, many high-risk patients miss some suitable interventions. Third, thresholds for risk strata are suboptimal and determined heuristically with no quality guarantee.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to improve risk-stratified patient management so that more patients will receive the most appropriate care.MethodsThis study will (1) combine patient, physician profile, and environmental variable features to improve prediction accuracy of individual patient health outcomes and costs; (2) develop the first algorithm to explain prediction results and suggest tailored interventions; (3) develop the first algorithm to compute optimal thresholds for risk strata; and (4) conduct simulations to estimate outcomes of risk-stratified patient management for various configurations. The proposed techniques will be demonstrated on a test case of asthma patients.ResultsWe are currently in the process of extracting clinical and administrative data from an integrated health care system’s enterprise data warehouse. We plan to complete this study in approximately 5 years.ConclusionsMethods developed in this study will help transform risk-stratified patient management for better clinical outcomes, higher patient satisfaction and quality of life, reduced health care use, and lower costs.

Highlights

  • In the early 20th century public health advances that addressed infectious diseases and poor nutrition greatly improved life expectancy

  • To maintain consistency with Anderson’s earlier multiple chronic conditions (MCC) chartbook, the authors used a chronic conditions classification system developed by Hwang and colleagues, described in two papers published in Health Affairs.[3,4]

  • The chronic condition classification list created by Hwang and colleagues is included, with permission, in Appendix B1, and is available in excel format at http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/AHRQMCC/shared-code. html

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the early 20th century public health advances that addressed infectious diseases and poor nutrition greatly improved life expectancy. As scientific understanding and technological advances have made acute and episodic illness (such as heart attack and stroke) survivable, chronic disease has become one of the most important challenges facing the United States healthcare system. More and more people are living with not just one chronic illness, such as diabetes, heart disease or depression, but with two or more conditions. 31.5% of all Americans, almost a third of the population, are living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC). It will be important to monitor the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions over time, to understand patterns of disease, the costs to the health care system and individuals, and the effect on quality of life

Background
Findings
Methodology
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call