Abstract

Over-the-counter (OTC) drugs have many benefits but also carry risks, such as adverse drug reactions, which are more prevalent in older adults. Because these products do not require the oversight of a physician or pharmacist, labeling plays a key role in communicating information required for their safe and effective use. Research suggests that current labels are not terribly effective at communicating potential risk. One reason for their lack of effectiveness is that few consumers attend to critical information (active ingredients and warnings) when making purchases. In two experiments, we used a change detection task to objectively evaluate how novel label designs that employ highlighting and a warning label placed on the package’s front impact attention to critical information among older participants (65 and older). The change detection task is a unique form of visual search which allowed us to assess the attentional priority of critical information among participants who were not explicitly instructed to search for this critical information. This unique aspect of the task is important given research suggesting that consumers rarely have the explicit goal of seeking out warnings and active ingredients when making OTC selections. Our results provide empirical support that both highlighting critical information and positioning it on the package’s front increase its attentional prioritization relative to current, commercial practice. Given that attending to the critical information is prerequisite to utilizing that information, strategies that elicit attention in this way are likely to reduce medication errors.

Highlights

  • Visual search tasks have a long history in cognitive psychology

  • Given that attention to information is a prerequisite for processing and using that information (Mack, 2003; Rensink et al, 1997; Simons & Chabris, 1999), there are a myriad of scenarios which less closely mirror traditional lab-based studies where visual search tasks can be used to investigate how well critical information attracts attention

  • In experiment 2, 1 person was dropped due to their Short Blessed Test Score being higher than 8, and 2 people were dropped due to computer errors leading to the subjects withdrawing before completion of the study task

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Visual search tasks have a long history in cognitive psychology. While most early experiments utilized these tasks to investigate basic mechanisms of attention (Schneider & Shiffrin, 1977; Treisman & Gelade, 1980; Wolfe, 1994), in recent years there has been an increased emphasis on leveraging our knowledge of visual search to real world applications. Our group has leveraged visual search tasks to evaluate how different strategies for designing labels influence attention to the most critical information presented on the label. We have done this for prescription drug labels (DeHenau et al, 2016; Lee et al, 2019), food labels (Becker et al, 2015), and medical device labels (Seo, 2014). Characterizing design strategies likely to catalyze consumers to attend critical information present on OTC labels is relevant to public health Even so, both researchers and regulators guiding the development of OTC label formats tend to focus their efforts on latestage processing (comprehension). Comprehension studies have utilized surveys and questionnaires (Murty & Sansgiry, 2007; Wawruch et al, 2013); guided interviews (King et al, 2011; Martin-Hammond et al, 2015; Tong et al, 2015, 2017); and focus groups (King et al, 2011; Tong et al, 2016) in which participants are asked to evaluate which type of warning text or display would be more effective

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call