Abstract

Abstract. Large wildfires exert strong disturbance on regional and global climate systems and ecosystems by perturbing radiative forcing as well as the carbon and water balance between the atmosphere and land surface, while short- and long-term variations in fire weather, terrestrial ecosystems, and human activity modulate fire intensity and reshape fire regimes. The complex climate–fire–ecosystem interactions were not fully integrated in previous climate model studies, and the resulting effects on the projections of future climate change are not well understood. Here we use the fully interactive REgion-Specific ecosystem feedback Fire model (RESFire) that was developed in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) to investigate these interactions and their impacts on climate systems and fire activity. We designed two sets of decadal simulations using CESM-RESFire for present-day (2001–2010) and future (2051–2060) scenarios, respectively, and conducted a series of sensitivity experiments to assess the effects of individual feedback pathways among climate, fire, and ecosystems. Our implementation of RESFire, which includes online land–atmosphere coupling of fire emissions and fire-induced land cover change (LCC), reproduces the observed aerosol optical depth (AOD) from space-based Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite products and ground-based AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) data; it agrees well with carbon budget benchmarks from previous studies. We estimate the global averaged net radiative effect of both fire aerosols and fire-induced LCC at -0.59±0.52 W m−2, which is dominated by fire aerosol–cloud interactions (-0.82±0.19 W m−2), in the present-day scenario under climatological conditions of the 2000s. The fire-related net cooling effect increases by ∼170 % to -1.60±0.27 W m−2 in the 2050s under the conditions of the Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) scenario. Such considerably enhanced radiative effect is attributed to the largely increased global burned area (+19 %) and fire carbon emissions (+100 %) from the 2000s to the 2050s driven by climate change. The net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon between the land and atmosphere components in the simulations increases by 33 % accordingly, implying that biomass burning is an increasing carbon source at short-term timescales in the future. High-latitude regions with prevalent peatlands would be more vulnerable to increased fire threats due to climate change, and the increase in fire aerosols could counter the projected decrease in anthropogenic aerosols due to air pollution control policies in many regions. We also evaluate two distinct feedback mechanisms that are associated with fire aerosols and fire-induced LCC, respectively. On a global scale, the first mechanism imposes positive feedbacks to fire activity through enhanced droughts with suppressed precipitation by fire aerosol–cloud interactions, while the second one manifests as negative feedbacks due to reduced fuel loads by fire consumption and post-fire tree mortality and recovery processes. These two feedback pathways with opposite effects compete at regional to global scales and increase the complexity of climate–fire–ecosystem interactions and their climatic impacts.

Highlights

  • Large wildfires show profound impacts on human society and the environment, with increasing trends in many regions around the world during recent decades (Abatzoglou and Williams, 2016; Barbero et al, 2015; Clarke et al, 2013; Dennison et al, 2014; Jolly et al, 2015; Westerling et al, 2006; Yang et al, 2011, 2015)

  • The annual fire carbon emissions used by Ward et al (2012) ranged from 1.3 Pg C yr−1 for the present-day simulation to 2.4 Pg C yr−1 for the future projection with ECHAM atmospheric forcing, while the fire black carbon (BC), particulate organic matter (POM), and SO2 emissions used by Jiang et al (2016) were based on the GFEDv3.1 dataset with an annual average fire carbon emission of 1.98 Pg C yr−1 (Randerson et al, 2012)

  • Though we mainly focus on fire–climate interactions without consideration of human impacts in this study, the REgion-Specific ecosystem feedback Fire model (RESFire) model is capable of capturing anthropogenic interference in fire activity and reproducing observation-based long-term trends of regional burning activity driven by climate change and human factors (Zou et al, 2019)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large wildfires show profound impacts on human society and the environment, with increasing trends in many regions around the world during recent decades (Abatzoglou and Williams, 2016; Barbero et al, 2015; Clarke et al, 2013; Dennison et al, 2014; Jolly et al, 2015; Westerling et al, 2006; Yang et al, 2011, 2015). In addition to hazardous impacts on human society, fire exerts strong disturbance on regional and global climate systems and ecosystems by perturbing the radiation budget and carbon balance between the atmosphere and land surface. These short-term and long-term changes in fire weather, terrestrial ecosystems, and human activity modulate fire intensity and reshape fire regimes in many climate-change-sensitive regions.

Fire model and sensitivity simulation experiments
Model input data
Model evaluation benchmarks and datasets
Evaluation of fire-related radiative effects
Fire-related disturbance to carbon balance
Simulations of climate–fire–ecosystem interactions using CESM-RESFire
Findings
Discussion of modeling uncertainties
Conclusions and implications
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.