Using blastocyst re-expansion rate for deciding when to warm a new blastocyst for single vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer

Abstract

Research questionCan predictive post-warm parameters that support the decision to transfer a warmed blastocyst or to warm another blastocyst be identified in women with multiple frozen–vitrified blastocysts? DesignRetrospective single-centre observational cohort analysis. A total of 1092 single vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfers (SVBT) with known Gardner score, maternal age and live birth were used to develop live birth prediction models based on logistic regression, including post-warm re-expansion parameters. Time-lapse incubation was used for pre-vitrification and post-warm embryo culture. A dataset of 558 SVBT with the same inclusion criteria was used to validate the model, but with known clinical pregnancy outcome instead of live birth outcome. ResultsThree different logistic regression models were developed for predicting live birth based on post-warm blastocyst re-expansion. Different post-warm assessment times indicated that a 2-h post-warm culture period was optimal for live birth prediction (model 1). Adjusting for pre-vitrification Gardner score (model 2) and in combination with maternal age (model 3) further increased predictability (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.623, 0.633, 0.666, respectively). Model validation gave an AUC of 0.617, 0.609 and 0.624, respectively. The false negative rate and true negative rate for model 3 were 2.0 and 10.1 in the development dataset and 3.5 and 8.0 in the validation dataset. ConclusionsClinical application of a simple model based on 2 h of post-warm re-expansion data, pre-vitrification Gardner score and maternal age can support a standardized approach for deciding if warming another blastocyst may increase the likelihood of live birth in SVBT.