Abstract

When working with regional data from different countries, issues concerning data comparability need to be solved, including regional comparability. Differing regional unit size is a common issue which influences the results of socio-economic analyses. In this paper, we introduce a strategy to deal with the regional incomparability of administrative data in international research. We propose a methodological approach based on the areal interpolation method, which facilitates the usage of advanced spatial analyses. To illustrate, we analyze spatial patterns of unemployment in seven Central European countries. We use a very detailed spatial (municipal) level to reveal local tendencies. To have comparable units across the whole region, we apply the areal interpolation method, a process of projecting data from source administrative units to the target structure of a grid. After choosing the most suitable grid structure and projecting the data onto the grid, we perform a hot spot analysis to show the benefits of the grid structure for socio-economic analyses. The proposed approach has great potential in international research for its methodological correctness and the ability to interpret results.

Highlights

  • We live in an era of open and big data

  • The main goal of this paper is to introduce a strategy on how to deal with the regional comparability issue, which is one of many issues connected with data comparability

  • This paper considers and tests two different areal interpolation methods for these purposes, (i) simple area weighting and (ii) areal kriging

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We live in an era of open and big data. Spatial micro-level and individual data are available for researchers across disciplines. In the case of statistical regional data, human geographers and regional scientists usually want to work with the most detailed units available, such as ZIP codes or municipalities. These data enable us to identify local specifics, which may be hidden when working with larger regional units. Governments invest a lot of money in the harmonization of country-specific data, the availability of comparable data is still problematic. It can be documented in the example of cross-national comparative research [1] or spatial data infrastructure [2]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call