Abstract

With the formation of the competitive elec- tricity markets in the world, optimization of bidding strategies has become one of the main discussions in studies related to market designing. Market design is challenged by multiple objectives that need to be satisfied. The solution of those multi-objective problems is searched often over the combined strategy space, and thus requires the simultaneous optimization of multiple parameters. The problem is formulated analytically using the Nash equi- librium concept for games composed of large numbers of players having discrete and large strategy spaces. The solution methodology is based on a characterization of Nash equilibrium in terms of minima of a function and relies on a metaheuristic optimization approach to find these minima. This paper presents some metaheuristic algorithms to simulate how generators bid in the spot electricity market viewpoint of their profit maximization according to the other generators' strategies, such as genetic algorithm (GA), simulated annealing (SA) and hybrid simulated annealing genetic algorithm (HSAGA) and compares their results. As both GA and SA are generic search methods, HSAGA is also a generic search method. The model based on the actual data is implemented in a peak hour of Tehran's wholesale spot market in 2012. The results of the simulations show that GA outperforms SA and HSAGA on computing time, number of function evaluation and computing stability, as well as the results of calculated Nash equilibriums by GA are less various and different from each other than the other algorithms.

Highlights

  • For a long time, the electric industry has been a natural monopoly

  • The problem is formulated analytically using the Nash equilibrium concept for games composed of large numbers of players having discrete and large strategy spaces

  • This paper presents some metaheuristic algorithms to simulate how generators bid in the spot electricity market viewpoint of their profit maximization according to the other generators’ strategies, such as genetic algorithm (GA), simulated annealing (SA) and hybrid simulated annealing genetic algorithm (HSAGA) and compares their results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The electric industry has been a natural monopoly. Power systems were designed to transmit large amounts of energy at high voltage level from remote generating units toward end users. Within the regulated monopoly structure, the customers had no choice but to buy electricity from the local utility. There was no incentive for the consumers to investigate and understand how power was produced, traded, transmitted and delivered to the end users. Electrical companies moved away from the vertically integrated monopolies to liberalized structures with power delivery being a bundle of services mainly including production, transmission and distribution of energy. Generating companies are no longer obliged to produce power as has been the case under centralized planning, but can choose to do so at a time and price that is profitable to them.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call