Abstract

BackgroundAppropriate hand hygiene (HH) is key to reducing healthcare-acquired infections. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends education and training to improve HH knowledge and compliance. Physicians are ranked among the worst of all healthcare workers for compliant handrubbing with its origin probably being the failure to learn this essential behavior during undergraduate medical studies. This study evaluated if the use of Ultraviolet-cabinets (UVc) for fluorescent-alcohol-based handrubs (AHR) during an undergraduate medical student training improved the compliance rate to the WHO hand hygiene recommendations (completeness of AHR application and HH opportunities).MethodsThis randomized trial compared a HH training with personal feedback (using UVc) to a control group. The first year, the students (2nd degree) were convened by groups (clusters) of 6–9 for a demonstration of the correct execution of WHO procedure. Randomization by cluster was done prior HH training. In the control group, the students hand rubbed under visual supervision of a tutor. In the intervention group after the same visual supervision, completeness of fluorescent-AHR hand application was recorded under UVc and was shown to the student. The intervention group had free access to the UVc until complete application. HH practices were included in simulation sessions for the both groups. One year after (3rd degree), all the students were asked to hand rub with fluorescent-AHR. A tutor (blinded to the study group) assessed the completeness of hand application under UVc and the compliance with the WHO opportunities. Complete application of AHR was defined as fluorescence for all the surfaces of hands and wrists.Results242 students participated (140 in the intervention group and 102 in the control group). One year after the initial training, the rate of complete application of AHR was doubled in the intervention group (60.0% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis which included gender, additional HH or UVc training, surgical traineeship and regular use of AHR, the hazard ratio for the intervention was 3.84 (95%CI: 2.09–7.06). The compliance with the HH WHO’s opportunities was increased in the intervention group (58.1% vs. 42.4%, p < 0.018).ConclusionUsing UVc for undergraduate medical students education to hand hygiene improves their technique and compliance with WHO recommendations.

Highlights

  • Appropriate hand hygiene (HH) is key to reducing healthcare-acquired infections

  • One year after the initial training, the rate of complete application of alcohol-based handrubs (AHR) was doubled in the intervention group (60.0% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001)

  • Main outcome: influence of supervised personal feedback on the completeness rate of AHR handrubbing On the second year of pedagogical program, the 3rd degree students in the intervention group presented a higher rate of completeness for AHR application as compared with the 3rd degree students of control group (60.0% versus 30.4% p < 0.001, intervention vs. control groups)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Appropriate hand hygiene (HH) is key to reducing healthcare-acquired infections. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends education and training to improve HH knowledge and compliance. This study evaluated if the use of Ultraviolet-cabinets (UVc) for fluorescent-alcohol-based handrubs (AHR) during an undergraduate medical student training improved the compliance rate to the WHO hand hygiene recommendations (completeness of AHR application and HH opportunities). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends education and training as part of a multimodal strategy to improve HH knowledge and handrubbing compliance. While compliant handrubbing for nosocomial infection prevention is more preponderant, poorly performed HH may lead to pathogen transmission as outlined in the “how to handrub” section of the WHO guidelines [9]. These guidelines use an ultraviolet (UV) light inspection cabinet among the pedagogical tools to enhance alcoholbased handrubs (AHR). The long-term effects of these educational programs is poorly analyzed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call