Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess the use of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to verify, and if necessary, optimize the cochlear implant (CI) fitting of adult CI users with postlingual single-sided deafness (SSD).MethodsSound field cortical responses to the speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/, and /s/ were recorded from input to the CI while the normal hearing ear was masked. Responses were evaluated by visual inspection and classified as presence or absence of the CAEPs components P1, N1, P2. In case of an absence fitting was adjusted accordingly. After fitting, subjects were asked to use their new setting for 2–3 weeks for acclimatization purposes and then return for retesting. At retesting, new CAEP recordings were performed to objectively ensure that the new fitting maps effectively activated the auditory cortex.ResultsIn 14/19 subjects, as per visual inspection, clear CAEPs were recorded by each speech token and were, therefore, not refit. In the other 5 subjects, CAEPs could not be evoked for at least one speech token. The fitting maps in these subjects were adjusted until clear CAEPs were evoked for all 4 speech tokens.ConclusionsCAEP can be used to quickly and objectively verify the suitability of CI fitting in experienced adult CI users with SSD. If used in the early post-implantation stage, this method could help CI users derive greater benefit for CI use and, therefore, be more committed to auditory training.

Highlights

  • Cochlear implantation is the most efficacious treatment for most people with bilateral severe or severe-to-profound deafness [1,2]

  • In 14/19 subjects, as per visual inspection, clear cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) were recorded by each speech token and were, not refit

  • The fitting maps in these subjects were adjusted until clear CAEPs were evoked for all 4 speech tokens

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cochlear implantation is the most efficacious treatment for most people with bilateral severe or severe-to-profound deafness [1,2]. The most recent expansion in candidacy criteria is for people with single-sided deafness (SSD), which is defined as having normal hearing (PTA 30 dB HL) in one ear but severe or profound hearing loss (PTA !70 dB HL) in the contralateral ear [7]. In several regions such as continental Europe and Australia CI is recognized and approved as a treatment option for SSD while in various countries such as the U.S.A. CI for SSD is still an off-label use of the device

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call