Using Affect-Expectations Theory to Explain the Direction of the Impacts of Experiential Emotions on Satisfaction

Abstract

Traditional research in consumer psychology considers valence (negative vs. positive) to be the primary dimension of an emotion. The direction of the impact an emotion has on consumer satisfaction is considered to be dictated by its valence. Drawing on the theory of affective expectations, in the case of experiential emotions, an alternative conceptualization is proposed in which this direction is seen as being conditional on emotional expectations associated with the consumption experience. When pertaining to consumers’ expectations relative to an anticipated experience, negative emotions can be the output benefit of consumption and contribute positively to satisfaction. Conversely, positive emotions that run against expectations can be a negative output and contribute negatively to satisfaction. On the basis of a qualitative study and a quantitative survey of movie consumption in theaters, it is established that positive (joy) as well as negative (sadness and fear) experiential emotions are positively associated with film expectations, whereas a positive emotion (calmness) runs against these expectations. Contrary to what traditional research predicts, not only joy but also sadness and fear demonstrate positive impacts on satisfaction whereas calmness, a positive emotion, has a negative impact.