Abstract

This study explored the shift in land use from livestock farming to game farming in the Eastern Cape, South Africa, from a social-ecological regime shift perspective. A regime shift can be defined as a large, persistent change in the structure and function of the intertwined social and ecological components of a landscape. This research focused on the Amakhala game reserve as a case study to understand how the shift affected the provision of ecosystem services and human wellbeing. We used remote sensing techniques to quantify changes in vegetation and found evidence of vegetation recovery following the shift. We then conducted interviews with both landowners and farmworkers and used participatory mapping to understand their perceptions of the main drivers and social-ecological impacts of the shift in land use. Social narratives revealed stark differences in different stakeholders’ perceptions, highlighting that the change in land use had varied implications for, and were perceived differently by, different stakeholders. Farmworkers emphasized changes in social structures that weakened community bonds and erased valued connections to the land. At the same time, they increased employment of women, skills development, and increased wages as benefits of the new game farming regime. Landowners, on the other hand, indicated financial gains from the land use change. The transition therefore resulted in trade-offs that surfaced as social, economic, and cultural losses and gains. These changes, especially in social relationships and community structures, have implications for resilience and possible future pathways of development in the region.

Highlights

  • Land use change, the transformation in the functional role of land for economic activities [1], has major implications for biodiversity and a wide variety of ecosystem services [2]

  • We discuss the shift from livestock to game farming in Amakhala in light of these criteria, emphasizing that the shift is associated with a complex set of inter-related social and ecological changes that lead to a complex set of changes in costs and benefits from an ecological, social, and economic perspective

  • A regime shift perspective can help provide a holistic view of the interconnected changes in a social-ecological system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The transformation in the functional role of land for economic activities [1], has major implications for biodiversity and a wide variety of ecosystem services [2]. Changes in land use can lead to changes in land cover, i.e., the change in natural cover of a landscape, e.g., from savannah to cropland [3] It is these changes in land cover that directly impact biodiversity [2,3] as well as a range of ecosystem services produced by human interaction with nature or ecological systems [4], including provisioning (e.g., food and water), regulating (e.g., water purification and control of soil erosion), and cultural services (e.g., recreation and aesthetic values) [5]. The changes may have social and economic effects on human societies, economies, and health [6,7,8].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.