Abstract

Abstract The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved the treatment with pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) targeting PD1 (anti-PD1), for patients with advanced solid tumors with a high tumor mutational burden (TMB) (defined as TMB ≥10 mutations/Mb). However, following recent studies suggest that TMB levels and response to ICI treatment may differ between male and female melanoma patients, we investigated whether using this high-TMB threshold for selecting patients for anti-PD1 treatment may induce a sex-dependent bias. We analyzed a large ICI cohort of 1,286 patients across nine cancer types treated with anti-PD1/PDL1. We find that using this threshold would indeed result in an unwarranted sex bias in melanoma, successfully stratifying female but not male patients. While this threshold is currently not a regulatory prerequisite for ICI treatment in melanoma, it is important to raise awareness to this bias. Notably, no sex-dependent significant differences were observed in the response of melanoma patients to anti-CTLA4 therapies, different chemotherapies or combination therapies. Beyond melanoma, the high-TMB threshold additionally introduces a sex bias of considerable magnitude in glioblastoma and in patients with cancers of unknown origin, however, these results are not statistically significant. A power analysis shows that these biases may become significant with larger sample size, warranting further careful testing in larger cohorts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call