Abstract

Objective: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) using cuff-based devices is used for diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Technical limitations, low compliance and complex procedure limit their use. The aim of the present study was to compare a new technique of 24H ABPM using a photoplethysmography (PPG)-based, wearable device to the standard cuff-based device. Design and method: In this prospective study, 24H ABPM was performed using a standard cuff-based device and the PPG-based device (Wrist-monitor) in parallel on volunteers aged 18–65 years, while documenting their daily activities. Level of comfort and activity disturbance of both devices were recorded. Linear regression and Bland-Altman were used to evaluate the agreement between the Wrist-monitor and Holter. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the ability of the Wrist-monitor to identify abnormal BP values. Results: The study included 28 subjects (18 men) mean age 41.5 ± 16.2 years. Bland-Altman analysis results in 24H bias of -1.1 mmHg for both diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Mean daytime bias was -1.9 mmHg for DBP and SBP, while nighttime bias was smaller (0.7 and 0.4 mmHg for DBP and SBP respectively). ROC curve analysis on all BP readings (n = 2381) yielded a mean area under the curve (AUC) for 24 hours of 0.965 for both SBP and DBP. 24H ABPM with the Wrist-monitor caused significantly less inconvenience compared to the Holter (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The cuff-less device provides comparable measurements to those obtained with the currently used ABPM device, with significantly less inconvenience to the subject.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call