Abstract

Online, accessible performance and heart rate data from running competitions are posted publicly or semi‐publicly to social media. We tested the efficacy of one such data resource‐ Strava‐ as a tool in exercise physiology investigations by exploring heart rate differences in mountain racing and road racing running events. Heart rate and GPS pace data were gathered from Strava activities posted by 111 males aged 21–49, from two mountain races (Mt. Washington Road Race and Pike's Peak Ascent) and two road race distances (half marathon and marathon). Variables of interest included race finish time, average heart rate, time to complete the first half (by distance) of the race, time to complete the second half, average heart rate for both the first and second half, estimated maximal heart rate, and competitiveness (finish time as percentage of winning time). Mountain runners on average showed no change in heart rate in the second versus first half of the event, while road racers at the half marathon and marathon distances showed increased second‐half heart rate. Mountain runners slowed considerably more in the second half than road runners. Heart rate increases in road races were likely reflective of cardiac drift. Altitude and other demands specific to mountain racing may explain why this was not observed in mountain races. Strava presents enormous untapped opportunity for exercise physiology research, enabling initial inquiry into physiological questions that may then be followed by targeted laboratory studies.

Highlights

  • Heart rate and GPS recording devices have become a common training tool for endurance athletes

  • Heart rate increased over the second half of both road events: half marathoners saw a 3.7 bpm increase (P < 0.01) and marathoners a 1.8 bpm increase (P < 0.05)

  • There was no change in heart rate in the second versus first half of MWRR and HR decreased by 4.4 bpm at PP, though not quite significantly (P = 0.056; see Table 2 and Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Heart rate and GPS recording devices have become a common training tool for endurance athletes. Standard data posted in Strava activities include pace and elevation, and sometimes heart rate and age. Some limitations are inherent: potentially relevant information, such as body mass, aerobic capacity, and training history are inaccessible without direct communication with individual athletes, which violates Strava’s terms of use. Despite these constraints Strava represents an untapped “big-data” source for exercise physiology research. We explore the efficacy of this novel investigative approach through a comparative study of heart rate profiles of road running and mountain running competitions, events for which sufficient data is available on Strava

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call