Abstract
What we are doing is to use a generalization of the Penrose Cyclic conformal cosmology in order to argue for ergodic mixing of cosmological “information”, from cycle to cycle. While there would be a causal discontinuity, as is by example explained, in terms of breaking down of individual “particles” from cycle to cycle, there would be (analogous to a seed setting of pseudo-randomization of Fortran) informational “bits” transferred, as far as mixing of “information” collected from cycle to cycle, from N number of contributing universes via modified CCC, so as to create a uniform value of H bar (Planck’s constant) from cycle to cycle. Moreover this would do away with the “baby universes” Darwinian hypothesis, set up by String theorists whom postulate that up to 101000 or so universes would be created, with only say 1010 or so surviving (most dying off) because of “improperly” set variance in the values of H bar (Planck’s constant). i.e. the laws of physics would not be different from universe to universe.
Highlights
What we are doing is to use a generalization of the Penrose Cyclic conformal cosmology in order to argue for ergodic mixing of cosmological “information”, from cycle to cycle
While there would be a causal discontinuity, as is by example explained, in terms of breaking down of individual “particles” from cycle to cycle, there would be informational “bits” transferred, as far as mixing of “information” collected from cycle to cycle, from N number of contributing universes via modified CCC, so as to create a uniform value of H bar (Planck’s constant) from cycle to cycle. This would do away with the “baby universes” Darwinian hypothesis, set up by String theorists whom postulate that up to 101000 or so universes would be created, with only say 1010 or so surviving because of “improperly” set variance in the values of H bar (Planck’s constant). i.e. the laws of physics would not be different from universe to universe
We refer the readers to an ergodic mixing procedure [1]-[3] as outlined in [4] by the author which is a way to have consistent mixing of “information” from the evolution to the death of universes, in terms of what is known as Penrose Cyclic conformal Cosmology [5]
Summary
We refer the readers to an ergodic mixing procedure [1]-[3] as outlined in [4] by the author which is a way to have consistent mixing of “information” from the evolution to the death of universes, in terms of what is known as Penrose Cyclic conformal Cosmology [5]. What we are doing is to use a generalization of the Penrose Cyclic conformal cosmology in order to argue for ergodic mixing of cosmological “information”, from cycle to cycle.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
