Abstract
ObjectivesTo implement and evaluate a pharmacy resident documentation peer review process. SettingThe University of Minnesota Postgraduate Year One Pharmacy Residency Program is a multisite program with 25 residents across 16 different health care organizations. Practice descriptionSites within the program provide comprehensive medication management (CMM) services to patients in ambulatory care settings, including participation in the full patient care process of assessment, care plan development, follow-up, and appropriate documentation. Practice innovationIn this innovative peer review process model, residents undergo a deidentified CMM documentation review process with residents from other practice sites, exposing them to different documentation templates and perspectives. EvaluationA workgroup of residency preceptors led by a research team developed a peer review process, which evolved through 3 phases over 2 years in response to resident, preceptor, and administration team feedback. Resident feedback was compiled and analyzed. ResultsForty-two residents responded to the survey (67% response rate); 71% found the review process to be helpful. Residents reported that the process improved their understanding of how to improve patient care documentation (74%), how to provide peer feedback (90%), and the importance of effective interprofessional communication in clinical decision making (81%). DiscussionThe core perceived benefit of the peer review process was exposure to how other health systems and practitioners document CMM. Some residents participate in a peer review process at their home institutions, which may explain some of the lack of perceived benefit. Generalizability of this study is limited by being within a single residency program with a relatively small number of participants. ConclusionPharmacy residents found a peer review process of documentation to be helpful during their residency education. The process exposed residents to different documentation practices at various health care systems, which led to ideas of how to improve documentation and provided a foundation for how to provide peer feedback in practice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.