Abstract

In the area of memory research there have been two rival approaches for memory measurement—signal detection theory (SDT) and multinomial processing trees (MPT). Both approaches provide measures for the quality of the memory representation, and both approaches provide for corrections for response bias. In recent years there has been a strong case advanced for the MPT approach because of the finding of stochastic mixtures on both target-present and target-absent tests. In this paper a case is made that perceptual detection, like memory recognition, involves a mixture of processes that are readily represented as a MPT model. The Chechile (2004) 6P memory measurement model is modified in order to apply to the case of perceptual detection. This new MPT model is called the Perceptual Detection (PD) model. The properties of the PD model are developed, and the model is applied to some existing data of a radiologist examining CT scans. The PD model brings out novel features that were absent from a standard SDT analysis. Also the topic of optimal parameter estimation on an individual-observer basis is explored with Monte Carlo simulations. These simulations reveal that the mean of the Bayesian posterior distribution is a more accurate estimator than the corresponding maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). Monte Carlo simulations also indicate that model estimates based on only the data from an individual observer can be improved upon (in the sense of being more accurate) by an adjustment that takes into account the parameter estimate based on the data pooled across all the observers. The adjustment of the estimate for an individual is discussed as an analogous statistical effect to the improvement over the individual MLE demonstrated by the James–Stein shrinkage estimator in the case of the multiple-group normal model.

Highlights

  • The title of this special issue implies two very different questions

  • 9A third approach exists for obtaining individual and group effects by means of a hierarchical Bayesian model similar to the analysis developed for multinomial processing trees (MPT) models by Klauer (2010)

  • The resulting Perceptual Detection (PD) model is a MPT model that has two mixture rate parameters that measure the proportion of times that the observer confidently detects something that belongs to an identifiable category

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The title of this special issue implies two very different questions. The first question is: how should perceptual decision-making be modeled? The second question is: how should individual differences be estimated? This paper addresses both of these questions from a perspective that has been informed by research in the area of model-based memory measurement. The original applications of SDT typically dealt with cases of detecting the presence of a slight intensity increase on a single sensory dimension such as the loudness of white noise or an increase in the brightness of a color patch The data from these studies are multinomial frequencies that are used to estimate either a signal sensitivity measure (d ) associated with the separation between two presumed distributions on a psychological strength continuum, or a non-parametric measure such as A associated with the area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. With training and experience the sonar operator can be highly skilled in detecting the complex set of features that are associated with an enemy threat; after all perceptual learning is a well established fact (Kellman, 2002) From this framework, the operator might confidently detect a target, not because of a greater strength or intensity, but because the metathetic pattern exhibited by the stimulus is linked through training to a particular type of target. This finding foreshadows a relatively surprising result that is similar to the James–Stein shrinkage estimate for individual model parameter estimates

DATA STRUCTURE AND TREE MODEL
INTERPRETING THE GUESSING PARAMETERS
PROPERTIES OF THE ROC FOR THE PD MODEL
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCE ESTIMATION FOR THE PD MODEL
Findings
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call