Abstract

A frequent pattern emerging from biodiversity-ecosystem function studies is that functional group richness enhances ecosystem functions such as primary productivity. However, the manipulation of functional group richness goes along with major disadvantages like the transformation of functional trait data into categories or the exclusion of functional differences between organisms in the same group. In a mesocosm study we manipulated plant functional diversity based on the multi-trait Functional Diversity (FD)-approach of Petchey and Gaston by using database data of seven functional traits and information on the origin of the species in terms of being native or exotic. Along a gradient ranging from low to high FD we planted 40 randomly selected eight-species mixtures under controlled conditions. We found a significant positive linear correlation of FD with aboveground productivity and a negative correlation with invasibility of the plant communities. Based on community-weighted mean calculations for each functional trait, we figured out that the traits N-fixation and species origin, i.e. being native or exotic, played the most important role for community productivity. Our results suggest that the identification of the impact of functional trait diversity and the relative contributions of relevant traits is essential for a mechanistic understanding of the role of biodiversity for ecosystem functions such as aboveground biomass production and resistance against invasion.

Highlights

  • Biodiversity is declining rapidly [1], which may negatively affect ecosystem functions [2] and economically important ecosystem services at the same time [3]

  • A few approaches and tools have been developed for measuring and assessing community’s functional diversity based on functional traits which led to our first research question, whether the proposed positive relationship between functional diversity and aboveground productivity is prevalent when communities were assembled on the basis of the Functional Diversity (FD) index by Petchey & Gaston [11,18]

  • By comparing the amount of variation in aboveground biomass production between our small-scale and short-term greenhouse study and these large-scale and longterm field experiments it is notable that functional diversity explained a higher amount of variation in our experiment (32%) than in the other studies (14% at Cedar Creek, 13% at the California experiment, and 15% at the Jena experiment; there is no comparable R2 value reported from the BIODEPTH experiment), even though Tilman et al [39] showed that diversity effects strengthen through time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biodiversity is declining rapidly [1], which may negatively affect ecosystem functions [2] and economically important ecosystem services at the same time [3]. The role of plant functional diversity on ecosystem properties has been a research focus in recent years [4,5,6]. Several different experiments have shown that positive diversity effects on plant community biomass production mostly result from niche complementarity in combination with a speciesspecific sampling effect [7,8,9,10]. The manipulation of functional group richness in biodiversity-ecosystem function experiments goes along with major disadvantages like the exclusion of functional differences that occur between organisms in the same group [11]. The assumption that ecosystem processes are governed by the abundance and distribution of functional traits in a community [5,12,13] has attracted growing attention on the use of functional trait composition, rather than species or functional group richness, in the explanation of biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.