Using a modified Delphi method to identify research priorities in an Australian regional health service

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Health service providers need to set their own research priorities to ensure investment of limited resources into projects relevant to their setting. Rural health services may face additional challenges in identifying research priorities if they comprise a research-naeïve workforce. This study examines the methods employed by one health service to identify research priorities across a multidisciplinary health service in regional Australia. Method A modified 3-round Delphi method was employed, with panellists from clinical divisions, management, and consumer groups. Modifications included delivery via etechnology; inclusion of a reference group; a large panel who were selected without prior consultation; provision for non-sequential engagement in rounds by panellists; and group level feedback between rounds. Results In total 270 panellists were enlisted from across the health service, representing all levels of management, clinicians with and without research experience, and consumers. Valid research priorities for the whole of service were successfully identified using the modified Delphi method. Conclusion This study demonstrates how a regional health service with minimal research experience, was able to utilise a modified Delphi methodology to facilitate research priority setting across a widespread and multidisciplinary health service. Modifications to the Delphi methodology and their utility within the research setting are discussed.