Using a Mobile Phone Application Versus Telephone Assistance During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Comparative Study

Abstract

IntroductionIn recent years, the way CPR instructions are given has changed because of the development of new technology that allows bystanders who witness a cardiac arrest to be guided in performing CPR. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of using a mobile phone application (app) versus telephone operator assistance in performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques in simulated settings. MethodsA comparative study was performed with 2 intervention groups: (1) mobile phone app and (2) telephone assistance. A total of 128 students participated and were distributed randomly into each intervention group. A CPR observation checklist and standard CPR quality parameter measurements were used for data collection. ResultsThe group that used the app obtained better results than the group that had telephone assistance on 5 items during CPR observation: checking if the area is secure (X2(1) = 26.81; P < 0.05), asking for help (X2(1) = 66.07; P < 0.05), opening of airways (X2(1) = 12.03; P < 0.05), checking for breathing (X2(1) = 6.10; P < 0.05), and contacting emergency services (X2(1) = 12.41; P < 0.05). Regarding the skill level of CPR, no statistically significant differences were found when comparing the 2 intervention groups (X2(1) = 0.91; P = 0.33). As for the parameters measured, there were only statistically significant differences found in the item compression fraction (U = 1,593.00; Z = −2.16; P < 0.05), with the group that used the app obtaining better results. DiscussionBetter outcomes were observed in recognizing if the area was safe, asking for help, opening up the airways, checking for breathing, and calling emergency services in the mobile phone app group. However, the results indicated that there were no differences in the CPR parameters, except compression fraction, when the app was used as opposed to being guided by telephone.