Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the primary motor cortex (M1), elicits motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in contralateral limb muscles which are valuable indicators of corticospinal excitability (CSE) at the time of stimulation. So far, most studies have used single-coil TMS over one M1, yielding MEPs in muscles of a single limb—usually the hand. However, tracking CSE in the two hands simultaneously would be useful in many contexts. We recently showed that, in the resting state, double-coil stimulation of the two M1 with a 1 ms inter-pulse interval (double-coil1 ms TMS) elicits MEPs in both hands that are comparable to MEPs obtained using single-coil TMS. To further evaluate this new technique, we considered the MEPs elicited by double-coil1 ms TMS in an instructed-delay choice reaction time task where a prepared response has to be withheld until an imperative signal is displayed. Single-coil TMS studies have repetitively shown that in this type of task, the motor system is transiently inhibited during the delay period, as evident from the broad suppression of MEP amplitudes. Here, we aimed at investigating whether a comparable inhibitory effect can be observed with MEPs elicited using double-coil1 ms TMS. To do so, we compared the amplitude as well as the coefficient of variation (CV) of MEPs produced by double-coil1 ms or single-coil TMS during action preparation. We observed that MEPs were suppressed (smaller amplitude) and often less variable (smaller CV) during the delay period compared to baseline. Importantly, these effects were equivalent whether single-coil or double-coil1 ms TMS was used. This suggests that double-coil1 ms TMS is a reliable tool to assess CSE, not only when subjects are at rest, but also when they are involved in a task, opening new research horizons for scientists interested in the corticospinal correlates of human behavior.

Highlights

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a technique used to assess corticospinal excitability (CSE), has gained substantial attention since it was first described about 30 years ago (Ziemann, 2017)

  • Reaction Times (RTs) were generally faster with TMSdelay than with TMSbaseline−in, consistent with many previous reports showing that a TMS pulse applied close to the imperative signal can prime subjects to respond faster (Duque et al, 2012; Labruna et al, 2014; Greenhouse et al, 2015b; Quoilin et al, 2016) probably because the TMS sound triggers the release of the movement that is being prepared (Carlsen et al, 2007, 2011)

  • We found that RTs were longer in trials where a MEPsingle occurred in the responding hand compared to when the MEPsingle fell in the nonresponding hand, or in both hands at once (MEPdouble)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a technique used to assess corticospinal excitability (CSE), has gained substantial attention since it was first described about 30 years ago (Ziemann, 2017). Many studies have reported a stronger left MEP suppression in conditions where the target muscle is selected for the forthcoming movement (i.e., left response) compared to when it is non-selected (i.e., right response) and it has been commonly accepted that this difference results from the distinct function (selected vs nonselected) of the left hand muscle in these two situations (Duque et al, 2010, 2014; Labruna et al, 2014). The stronger left MEP suppression with left than right hand responses may be due to the use of the non-dominant vs. dominant hand rather than to the distinct function of the targeted muscle in these trials

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call