Abstract
We examine how accounting disclosures affect users' assessments of management credibility and, in turn, their expectations of the auditor. In a lease obligation setting, our experiment separates the effects of understanding the financial impact of accounting treatment (by manipulating the presence of a supplemental reconciliation from disclosure to recognition) from inferences made based on management's choice of accounting disclosures (by manipulating the source of the reconciliation). Users who receive a reconciliation report lower management credibility, higher investment risk, and higher audit expectations when the reconciliation is provided by a source other than management. By documenting boundary conditions in which audit expectations are higher for disclosed information, we extend research on the influence of reporting discretion to audit expectations, with implications for the expectation gap and auditors' potential business risk.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.