Abstract

Calculations, according to some open-system models, point out that while a statistically significant discrepancy between the results of two U-series methods,230Th/234U and227Th/230Th (or231Pa/235U), attests a relatively recent and important uranium migration, concordant dates cannot guarantee closed-system behavior of a sample. The results of 20 fossil bones from 10 Chinese sites, 19 of which are determined by two U-series methods, are given. Judging from independent age controls, 8 out of the 11 concordant age sets are unacceptable. The results in this paper suggest that uranium may cycle into or out of fossil bones, such geochemical events may take place at any time and no known preserving condition may securely protect them from being affected. So for the sites we have studied, the U-series dating of fossil bones is of limited reliability.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.