Abstract

The combination of various residual stress measurement methods is a common practice to complete knowledge that a single measurement method cannot provide. In this study, incremental X-Ray diffraction is combined with the contour method to measure a bent notched specimen to study the methods robustness. A finite element analysis model is built and validated with strain measurement of the bending process thus providing prior knowledge of the residual stress field. Three-dimensional neutron diffraction residual stress measurements are also performed to obtain a reference measurement with a non-destructive method and to validate the simulated stress field. In-depth stress gradient measured by X-ray diffraction is corrected with four different methods that all show good correlation with neutron diffraction measurements. Correction methods, assumptions and uncertainties are discussed and differences are observed on the robustness of the methods. Contour method measurements are performed and results are also in agreement with neutron measurements. The results provided by the contour method are complementary to those of the X-Ray diffraction since, despite a lower accuracy on the edges where X-ray diffraction is performed, the contour method offers the complete cartography of longitudinal stress in a symmetry plane of the bent specimen. Uncertainty of the contour method due to the post-processing procedure is discussed.

Highlights

  • Residual stresses (RS) may have a strong influence on the mechanical resistance of parts [1, 2] and need to be characterized

  • If all methods aim at measuring local stresses through local strains, X-ray Diffraction (XRD) uses lattice spacing by measuring diffracting peak shift whereas relaxation methods such as the contour method measure part deformation at the meso-scale disregarding thereby variation at the micro-scale

  • After 2 mm, raw XRD results diverge from Neutron Diffraction (ND) measurements and after 5.25 mm raw XRD results are still positive whereas ND results indicate a change of longitudinal stress sign at 4 mm away from the notch

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Residual stresses (RS) may have a strong influence on the mechanical resistance of parts [1, 2] and need to be characterized. The measurement of residual stresses remains a challenging problem as no unique method exists. Combining methods is a solution either to obtain different information, or to validate the assumptions and approximations of each measurement technique. Combining a diffraction method and a relaxation based method is interesting as their fundamental measurement principle is not the same. If all methods aim at measuring local stresses through local strains, X-ray Diffraction (XRD) uses lattice spacing by measuring diffracting peak shift whereas relaxation methods such as the contour method measure part deformation at the meso-scale (i.e., scale of the specimen) disregarding thereby variation at the micro-scale

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call