Abstract

Calibration, or in other words ”validation”, of complex indoor aerosol models that simulate the dynamic behavior of particle number size distributions are often assumed to solely depend on the characteristics of the model and its setup. The user influence is rarely mentioned in that regard. This paper shows, with a simple exercise, the user influence on the calibration of an indoor aerosol model. It is also shown that a reasonable model simulation was achieved with a different understanding of the system modeled and several input parameter values. We utilized a single compartment and size-resolved indoor aerosol model approach to be calibrated against a model room. This kind of simple indoor aerosol models is very common in the literature and widely used in the analysis of indoor-to-outdoor relationship of aerosol particles. The input parameters for such indoor aerosol models are: outdoor particle number size distributions, indoor domain geometries, ventilation rate, penetration factor, and friction velocity (or deposition rate onto indoor surfaces). For simplicity, we considered the penetration factor and friction velocity are the only unknown input parameters to be chosen freely by the user so that the model is calibrated. We made it clear by this study that a user can influence the input parameter values significantly. Even though this suggests different sets of input parameter values can be valid for a model calibration, the model simulation differences between different calibration results remained within 1%. This implies that it is more challenging to calibrate a complex indoor aerosol model that requires many input parameters.

Highlights

  • Indoor aerosol models have been very useful tools to understand the importance of different mechanisms and to predict their effects on indoor air pollutants concentration under given circumstances (e.g. Nazaroff, 2004; Hussein and Kulmala, 2008)

  • Calibration, or in other words “validation”, of complex indoor aerosol models that simulate the dynamic behavior of particle number size distributions are often assumed to solely depend on the characteristics of the model and its setup

  • This kind of simple indoor aerosol models is very common in the literature and widely used in the analysis of indoor-to-outdoor relationship of aerosol particles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Indoor aerosol models have been very useful tools to understand the importance of different mechanisms and to predict their effects on indoor air pollutants concentration under given circumstances (e.g. Nazaroff, 2004; Hussein and Kulmala, 2008). Nazaroff, 2004; Hussein and Kulmala, 2008). In this study we aim at illustrating that (1) a user of an indoor aerosol model might influence the results of the model calibration and (2) there can be several sets of input parameters values lead to acceptable simulation results. To justify these objectives we employed two users to calibrate an indoor aerosol model against the same indoor-outdoor aerosol data set.

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.