Abstract
This paper reports on a review of user charges for health services in rural areas of Papua New Guinea. Facilities implementing both fee for service and community risk sharing schemes were studied. This study found that there is a lack of any policy framework or practical guidelines on cost recovery. In some areas fees are being used as a fiscal tool rather than to further health policy. This study from Papua New Guinea raises serious questions about the virtue of cost recovery for health services in rural areas. Equity is an issue and the fees are creating a barrier both for entry and continuation in the health system; accountability is poor, and issues of cross subsidization are not addressed; fee revenues from rural health services are small and primarily of local significance; and are not being used to improve quality of health services. Cost recovery schemes in rural areas have the potential to provide a valuable contributory source of income to operate and improve health services. In practice, few are achieving this. It is concluded that health sector financing focus could be more fruitfully directed to financing mechanisms with greater potential to improve and expand health services.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.