Abstract
Past broadband adoption initiatives underscored common wisdom: “We cannot manage what we cannot accurately measure”, “Trust but verify”. Self-reported Federal Communications Commission data has been notoriously unreliable or lacking granularity and that led to an overoptimistic perception of the quality and coverage of broadband services. Data collected in the past was deficient in providing a complete view of the user experience by focusing exclusively on a simple metric, bandwidth availability. Moreover, data collected in the past typically provided a point-in-time perspective on the state of broadband services in each region. In this paper, we discuss a new set of metrics and measurement techniques needed to make broadband funding decisions efficient in terms of quality of services delivered and return on investment, and to track their progress. We propose composite metrics that capture the complete value of the service to the user and emphasize the feasibility of measuring and monitoring such a metric over time.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
