Abstract
As for now, it seems to be infeasible to predict or measure the perceived degree of discomfort glare from windows. Within an international research project between Delft University of Technology and Berlin University of Technology, user acceptance studies are carried out in full-scale rooms under real sky conditions to study discomfort glare in daylit situations. The aim of the studies was to draw up a relation between glare assessments and measured quantities. For this purpose two test rooms are used: one room was occupied by the subject, in the other one the required measuring equipment was placed. An electronic questionnaire was developed for these studies and installed on the computer of the subject. Continuous measurements were necessary to link subjective assessments to measured quantities that are obtained concurrently. The obtained relation can be used to predict the average visual comfort evaluation under specific lighting conditions and to propose visual comfort criteria to maintain visual comfort. The study showed that the vertical illuminance measured near the facade and the average sky luminance measured from the back of the room are good measures to monitor visual comfort under intermediate and overcast sky conditions. The visual comfort criteria should nonetheless be used with care, since the diversity of individual preferences is large. The user preferably has an user interface to overrule the glare protection when it is controlled on these visual comfort criteria.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.