Abstract

Generally, non-contrast, lower-extremity, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) uses electrocardiography; thus, examination is difficult in patients who exhibit arrhythmia. However, the use of electrocardiography can be avoided by using the selective excitation technique in non-electrocardiogram-gated three-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) (pNon-Gate) MRA. Therefore, patients who exhibit arrhythmia can be examined with pNon-Gate MRA. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of pNon-Gate MRA by using a whole-body coil. Images acquired using pNon-Gate MRA were compared with images acquired using electrocardiogram-gated two-dimensional TOF (Gate) MRA. Comparisons comprised visual evaluation, as well as comparisons of contrast-to-noise ratio and imaging time. In visual evaluation of the pelvic region, Gate MRA showed better results than pNon-Gate MRA. In terms of contrast-to-noise ratio, there were no significant differences in either region. Imaging time showed no significant differences between the two methods. However, it exceeded 30 minutes frequently for Gate MRA, but rarely for pNon-Gate MRA. pNon-Gate MRA is useful in patients with frequent arrhythmia and in those with difficulty in maintaining long-term postures. By using a whole-body coil, pNon-Gate MRA enables easier patient positioning and setting. Therefore, pNon-Gate MRA can be used in routine examinations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.