Abstract

Molecular markers have been successfully used to distinguish between livestock species and breeds not closely related, for example through the clustering methodology. However, the differentiation between purebred and crossbred individuals would be an appealing purpose that has been little explored. In this study three clustering approaches are tested for their ability to detect crossbred individuals and to separate them from pure ones. Real microsatellite data from Iberian and Duroc breeds were utilised as an example. Simulated F1, Iberian and Duroc backcrossed individuals obtained from the real microsatellite were also assessed. The results of this study indicate that the clustering methods showed a reduced ability to detect the original subpopulations (Iberian breed, Duroc breed, F1, Iberian backcross and Duroc backcross). Reasons for such performance could be the absence of Hardy-Weinberg and linkage equilibrium within the subpopulations and the fact that the Iberian group was compound by individuals belonging to different strains. To test the influence of these factors an allele randomisation procedure was performed within each subpopulation. After that, none of the methods recovered the five groups, but the algorithm implemented in BAPS (Bayesian analysis of population structure) gave a partition where pure Iberian individuals were separated for the rest. It can be concluded that the lack of homogeneity within groups is the main cause of the reduced accuracy of the clustering methods in the separation of pure and crossed individuals.

Highlights

  • Livestock populations have been subjected to a variety of evolutionary forces during their histories

  • Each backcross grouped with its predominant pure line, while F1 individuals were placed into both groups

  • Molecular markers have been successfully used to distinguish between livestock species and breeds not closely related (Toro et al, 2009)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Livestock populations have been subjected to a variety of evolutionary forces during their histories. The use of the local breed as a female populations (instead of a male population, which might be more profitable) may be advisable to guarantee the maintenance of a large population of the local genotype adapted to the production environment. The use of a high performance breed that will produce crosses that can not be distinguished from the local breed is not advisable, because of the risk of involuntary introduction of different genotypes into the local breed. In these circumstances it would be interesting to separate purebred from crossbred individuals based on the molecular information available for them

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.